The way we were

In a turning point of the 1980 Presidential campaign, the Republican challenger asked:

“How many of you are better off now than you were four years ago?”

Examining some unemployment rates:

Nov, 1976:  7.8% – Carter elected.

Nov, 1980: 7.5% – Reagan elected.

Nov, 1982: 10.8% – Mid term elections

Mar, 1989: 5.0% – Best value under Reagan/Bush

Nov, 1992: 7.4% – Clinton Elected

Apr, 2000: 3.8% – Best value under Clinton

Dec, 2000: 3.9% – Bush appointed

Nov, 2008: 6.8% Obama elected

Summarizing:

o More were better off in 1980 than 1976.

o Things got much worse under supply side economics, before they got better

o The lowest unemployment rates were after the Clinton administration edged up the tax rates on the highest incomes.

It might be mentioned that:

o These are national – they might have been better or worse in some areas than in others.

o The rate always understates the true unemployed.

Brooks says: “Spending freeze ‘Insane'”

That would be David Brooks, not Mel, and he was speaking during an appearance on “This Week with George Stephanopoulos”.    “New York Times columnist David Brooks said on Sunday that it was “insane” for Republicans in Congress, including every GOP member of the House, to support a spending freeze in the middle of a recession.  “Tying such proposals to an intellectual simplicity exhibited by Rush Limbaugh, the conservative scribe also said the party was too obsessed with pursuing the legacy of Ronald Reagan in a drastically different time.  The problem with them and the problem with Limbaugh in terms of intellectual philosophy is they are stuck with Reagan,” … They are stuck with the idea that government is always the problem. A lot of Republicans up in Capitol Hill right now are calling for a spending freeze in a middle of a recession/depression. That is insane. But they are thinking the way they thought in 1982, if we can only think that way again, that is just insane. And there are a lot of Republicans like David Frum … who are trying to say Reagan was right for his era, but it is time to move on. And there are just not a lot of them on Capitol Hill right now, and I think the party is looking for that kind of Republican.”

Well said Mr. Brooks, even though I abhor seeing limp bough’s name in the same sentence with the word ‘intellectual’ –  although ‘simplicty’ did rescue the statement.  Also, having read Stockman’s “The triumph of Politics, How the Reagan Revolution Failed” (he was budget director during the early scenes of that B movie). I also cringe when I see the actor’s named linked with policy. 

Before jumping on the good ship Reagan, one must ask if  ‘Reagonomics’ worked? It certainly did: 

  o It redistributed wealth from the lower and  middle classes to the very wealthiest.

  o Increased our national debt nearly ten fold.

  o Allowed our infrastructure and education systems to deteriorate.

  o Left us unprepared for the post cold war world: enter Japan, then Korea, then China, et all.

N.B.: I am including Bush 41 & 43 with Ronald I, under supply-side slumdogs. 

see: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/08/brooks-gop-spending-freez_n_172838.html

Ronald Reagan: An Emperor of Evil – Myths and The Lost Decade

When the person selected by the GOP to act the part of President of the United States said: “Evolution is only a theory.”, I never tuned into that frequency again: anyone who says Ron was a great speaker or communicator has little need for facts or meaningful content.    One might counter “Almost any theory is of more value than  almost any myth.”

Among the myths concerning the Reagan Administration (and its continuation, Bush 41):

o More people were better of in 1976 than they were in 1980.  Wrong.  He entered office in 1981 during a period of economic stagnation, and a recession quickly followed: they didn’t fix any problems – they created them.

o He intimidated the Soviet Union into over-spending on defense.  Wrong – they actually reduced such spending in the 1980’s.

o He ended the cold war.  Wrong – the symbolic, if not real – ending was the demise of the Berlin Wall in 1991 (Bush 41).

o He won the cold war.  Wrong – Japan won the cold war.

o Supply side economics worked .  Wrong.  If it had, then why did our national debt grow from about one billion to three billion under Reagan, and another billion under Bush 41?  The most dramtic effect has been the growing disparity of incomes in the US between the highest 5% and the lower 50%.

o He was the most popular President in history.  Wrong: Willaim J. Clinton had a higher approval rating upon leaving office.

And the beat goes on.  Several new books have recently been published on the great deceiver, including:

– “The Man Who Sold the World: Ronald Reagan and the Betrayal of Main Street America,”  by William Kleinknecht

From Truthdig: ” Kleinknecht’s thesis is nothing less than that Reagan was the “obvious enemy of the common people he claimed to represent, this empty suit who believed in flying saucers and allowed an astrologer to guide his presidential scheduling. …” The great conundrum “is this: none of [the] unmistakable harbingers of American decline is being laid where it belongs—at the door of Ronald Reagan” [emphasis Kleinknecht’s].”

see http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/20090213_allen_barra_on_the_myth_of_ronald_reagan/

-“Tear Down this Myth:How the Reagan Legacy Has Distorted Our Politics and Haunts Our Future.””, by Will Bunch

From the above truthdig:”… Bunch sees Reagan primarily as a pragmatist whose image has been hijacked by a neoconservative cabal while Kleinknecht sees Reagan himself as the betrayer of what once was regarded as genuine conservatism.”

In 1981 the US faced opportunities not unlike they faced in 1961:

o Become Energy independent (Which Carter had started with CAFE).

o Prepare for a post cold war world, by reducing our military spending and increasing spending on infrastructure and education.

o Work toward Peace in the Middle East.

o Increase our emphasis on science and technology, as we had done in the late fifty’s and sixty’s, to achieve our goals, both domestic and global.

With the anti-intellectuals in charge, that didn’t happened, and we still reap the fruit of the poisoned vines today.  He has passed on, and its time to tell the kids about both him and Santa – what they were suppossed to have done was not and is not real.