Rushdie says ‘Slumdog Impossible’

From: Huffpost

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/23/salman-rushdie-slumdog-fu_n_169068.html

An interesting perspective on the movies 

“ATLANTA — Famed novelist Salman Rushdie apparently wasn’t too impressed with the Oscar-winning film “Slumdog Millionaire,” telling an Atlanta audience it “piles impossibility on impossibility.”

Rushdie, who spent years in hiding after Iran’s Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini called for the author’s death in 1989, made the remarks Sunday during a speech to more than 1,000 people at Atlanta’s Emory University. The author criticized other Oscar winners adapted from books, including “The Reader” and “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.”

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports the 61-year-old author of “The Satanic Verses” complained about several scenes, including one in which characters wind up at the Taj Mahal _ 1,000 miles from the previous scene.

“Slumdog Millionaire” won eight Oscars on Sunday, including best picture.”

For more details, see:

http://www.ajc.com/services/content/printedition/2009/02/23/rushdie0223.html?cxntlid=inform_sr

Brave New World

From Progress Ohio:

“The conservatives—that’s right, the very same folks who just dragged us along on an eight-year drunken binge during which they borrowed-and-spent us into the deepest financial catastrophe in nearly a century—are now standing there, faces full of moral rectitude, fingers pointing and shaking in our faces, righteously lecturing the rest of us on the topic of “fiscal responsibility.”

From the author:

Many in the GOP have not yet realized that they no longer control the three elected branches of Federal Government,  that they have lost the youth vote, much of the geographic US, and their base is narrowing to the wealthiest familes and white Southern males.  Conservatives  have a lock on talk radio, but Progressives have the Internet, and I’ll take that.

Progress at last

From Alternet, five progressive moves from the administration that Fox Noise, etc., might have missed.

Infrastructure:

o 9.3 Billion for high speed rail

o 7 Billion for Broadband

Establishment clause:

o redoing of  ‘faith based’ initiatives

Drug enforcement:

o New czar in town – has reform as agenda

Arms Control

o Sent Kissenger to Moscow to negotiate.

Thanks, see:

http://www.alternet.org/workplace/127848/?page=1

Faith Based Funding NOT in Jobs/Stimulus Bill

From the Secular Coalition for America:

“Yesterday, President Obama signed into law an economic stimulus package that DID NOT include funding for the Compassion Capital Fund.  $100 million was not funneled to religious organizations that otherwise would have been permitted to engage in discriminatory hiring practices.”

To Improve relations with Islamic Peoples and Nations, let’s go back to 1797

Our new Secretary of State, Ms. Hillary Clinton, has announced that a goal of the United States is to improve our image with countries which champion Islam.  One way to achieve this noble ambition would be to brush off the Treaty of Tripoli, created during the Washington administration and signed by President John Adams in 1797.  It involved a form of terrorism – piracy on the high seas – and contained an idea very familiar to the founders of our then young nation:

Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.”

from http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/treaty_tripoli.html

Let’s value Education and Health Care

In a recent NY Times Article, Paul Krugman writes:

“So maybe I was wrong. I used to consider health care our greatest national shame, considering that we spend twice as much on medical care as many European nations, yet American children are twice as likely to die before the age of 5 as Czech children — and American women are 11 times as likely to die in childbirth as Irish women.”

Chilling reality.

“Yet I’m coming to think that our No. 1 priority actually must be education. That makes the new fiscal stimulus package a landmark, for it takes a few wobbly steps toward reform and allocates more than $100 billion toward education.”

Thank you Mr. Krugman: the last time we valued education was in the ‘post sputnik panic’, our national reaction after the Soviets launched the first earth satellite in Oct of 1957.  “How could those  godless communists have succeeded? ”

see http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/15/opinion/15kristof.html?em

Ronald Reagan: An Emperor of Evil – Myths and The Lost Decade

When the person selected by the GOP to act the part of President of the United States said: “Evolution is only a theory.”, I never tuned into that frequency again: anyone who says Ron was a great speaker or communicator has little need for facts or meaningful content.    One might counter “Almost any theory is of more value than  almost any myth.”

Among the myths concerning the Reagan Administration (and its continuation, Bush 41):

o More people were better of in 1976 than they were in 1980.  Wrong.  He entered office in 1981 during a period of economic stagnation, and a recession quickly followed: they didn’t fix any problems – they created them.

o He intimidated the Soviet Union into over-spending on defense.  Wrong – they actually reduced such spending in the 1980’s.

o He ended the cold war.  Wrong – the symbolic, if not real – ending was the demise of the Berlin Wall in 1991 (Bush 41).

o He won the cold war.  Wrong – Japan won the cold war.

o Supply side economics worked .  Wrong.  If it had, then why did our national debt grow from about one billion to three billion under Reagan, and another billion under Bush 41?  The most dramtic effect has been the growing disparity of incomes in the US between the highest 5% and the lower 50%.

o He was the most popular President in history.  Wrong: Willaim J. Clinton had a higher approval rating upon leaving office.

And the beat goes on.  Several new books have recently been published on the great deceiver, including:

– “The Man Who Sold the World: Ronald Reagan and the Betrayal of Main Street America,”  by William Kleinknecht

From Truthdig: ” Kleinknecht’s thesis is nothing less than that Reagan was the “obvious enemy of the common people he claimed to represent, this empty suit who believed in flying saucers and allowed an astrologer to guide his presidential scheduling. …” The great conundrum “is this: none of [the] unmistakable harbingers of American decline is being laid where it belongs—at the door of Ronald Reagan” [emphasis Kleinknecht’s].”

see http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/20090213_allen_barra_on_the_myth_of_ronald_reagan/

-“Tear Down this Myth:How the Reagan Legacy Has Distorted Our Politics and Haunts Our Future.””, by Will Bunch

From the above truthdig:”… Bunch sees Reagan primarily as a pragmatist whose image has been hijacked by a neoconservative cabal while Kleinknecht sees Reagan himself as the betrayer of what once was regarded as genuine conservatism.”

In 1981 the US faced opportunities not unlike they faced in 1961:

o Become Energy independent (Which Carter had started with CAFE).

o Prepare for a post cold war world, by reducing our military spending and increasing spending on infrastructure and education.

o Work toward Peace in the Middle East.

o Increase our emphasis on science and technology, as we had done in the late fifty’s and sixty’s, to achieve our goals, both domestic and global.

With the anti-intellectuals in charge, that didn’t happened, and we still reap the fruit of the poisoned vines today.  He has passed on, and its time to tell the kids about both him and Santa – what they were suppossed to have done was not and is not real.

Separate, and NOT Equal: Incomes in Post New Deal America

Having waited several months to get “unequal democracy” by Larry M. Bartels from the library, I was able to handle the differed gratification when the book finally arrived: it is a treasure.  To most who read this blog, the basics are hardly news, but the supporting facts are deep. 

  o Income inequality has been increasing in the USA dramatically since the mid 70’s

  o It is the product of polices of a system dominated by the interests of the wealthy.

  o Elected officals often ignore the interest of the poor and working poor.

  o The differences have been more dramatic under GOP presidents.

  o  Bush/GOP ‘tax cuts’ of 2001 and 2003, together with the erosion of the minimum wage, have widened the have/havenot gap.

  o Few Americans are aware of how vast the disparity is.

Mr. Bartels, of Princeton University, also offers an explanation of why voters often appear to vote against their interests: deception and disingenuousness, not values: “Do abortions and gay marriages matter when the cupboard is bare and the sheriff is auctioning off the furniture in the front yard?”

Some of this situation has changed since the Great Uprising of  November, 2008, because the majority were motivated, regeristered, and mobilized to vote, but the inequality is still there.

Stay tuned…

Published by Princeton University Press, 2007

Immigrate our way to Recovery?

From Tom Friedman: “All you need to do is grant visas to two million Indians, Chinese and Koreans,” said Shekhar Gupta, editor of The Indian Express newspaper. “We will buy up all the subprime homes. We will work 18 hours a day to pay for them. We will immediately improve your savings rate — no Indian bank today has more than 2 percent nonperforming loans because not paying your mortgage is considered shameful here. And we will start new companies to create our own jobs and jobs for more Americans.””

Serious: see: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/opinion/11friedman.html?_r=1&ref=opinion

A New Day for Government’s Role in the Economy

No – NOT Morning in America-

“WASHINGTON — The Senate’s vote on — and the likely approval of — an $838 billion economic-stimulus plan Tuesday will signal a decisive new expansion of the government’s role in the economy.

The package will include tens of billions of dollars to help states pay for health-care, education and highways. It’ll provide tax breaks for new car and home buyers. It will help to computerize health records and invest heavily in 21st-century renewable energy technology.

“Just think about Rosie the Riveter manufacturing solar panels and wind turbines,” said Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., describing the bill’s long-term impact.”

(McClatchy)

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/economics/story/61844.html